Planet Chili

Saves me the trouble of cloning

Eventually I'd like to have some kind of analysis in place that checks for missing bindables like this.

I've been cockblocked by the inability to forward declare inner classes in the past. It's another indication that I need to curb my inner class fetish.

It sounds to me like you're missing some crucial bindable with your box. When you draw with other entities those entities bind it and then it carries over to your box draw.

Sharing code over a pdf filled with screencaps is weird. Post a link to your repo on github.

Merry xmas man, hope you had a good one with the fam.

Yo, but encapsulation rules tho

You should try std::partial_sum for the 1st xform there.

Additionally, you can do constexpr auto Crapdaptor = [](auto&& function) { return [function](auto&& left_ptr, auto&& right_ptr) { return function(*left_ptr, *right_ptr); }; }; std::sort(v.begin(),v.end(),Crapdaptor(std::mem_fn(&Foo::operator>))); Pls don't :peppers: I think he's trying to avoid dec...

Yeah, that is the idea. Although I suppose you could use SFINAE to make the adaptor support both binary and unary. You can just do normal overloading to support operator() for shared_ptr, unique_ptr, T*. If the second template param is a data member ptr, forward reference to that member of the objec...

So I've been tinkering with a simple idea of a metafunction that can take a normal binary function like std::less that works with references, and adapt it to work with pointers. A simple implementation here that works for std::unique_ptr (the most common use case for me personally), but the return v...

yeah early out is going to be good if collisions are rare, the branch predictor will ensure that pipe flushes are rare as well