Planet Chili

About for each: Just intelesence) Things about by value/reference I have made clear in discord) Anyway your explanation as always makemethinkabout) Thx srsly.
About remove_erase_if(): Just my vision of implementing that function while I was writing it.

My soul is free now...
Oh, hello there. I will stay behind, to gaze at the sun. The sun is a wondrous body. Like a magnificent father! If only I could be so grossly incandescent!

3d one. Can't even imagine how did you do that without searches... (didn't watch the video): // code goes here for each (int num in numpies) { auto temp = std::find_if(numbers.begin(), numbers.end(), [num](const Pube pube) { return num == pube.num; } ); if (temp != numbers.end()) { std::cout << temp...

kk. i will write my solutions here provide I'll find them 2nd : First of all I copy from stackoverflow 2 additional functions for breaking entire string into tokens for dealing with them further: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/236129/the-most-elegant-way-to-iterate-the-words-of-a-string Answer ...

albinopapa, nice, saw that way to overload operator but ignored)
Chili, it's not unfair, it's just not trivial and your restrictions like ONE-STATEMENT SOLUTION || DON'T USE THAT OP FUNCTION IN ALGORITHMS have been fucking me since i saw them.

Greatings traveler! How do we manage "<< operator" in HW for I15 in foreach loop? This is because in our Stack class we implement Iterator class? Because I had stucked with error "operand types are : std::ostream << Stack::Element" when I implemented first task kind of. And I still have it even if I...

I made mistake in previous message, but u're still owning me and u've made answer on that too, dude) Thx a lot.
About RL: in steam machine i have another name)

Almost correct. But now It's exist in heap, not in stack? Or...
I mean but in both situations we use dot operator for useing the members?

Exhaustive answer! :o :o :o class MyClass { public: int GetTrue() { return 42; } private: }; void main() { MyClass* pointer = new MyClass(); MyClass* ponterToAnArray = new MyClass[5]; MyClass* arrayOfPointers[5]; for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { arrayOfPointers[i] = new MyClass(); } pointer->GetTrue();...

Ok man, It's clear. But what if MemeField allocated dynamicly too? I mean the only way to allocate array with not fixed size it's: ? Tile* pTile = new Tile[some not constant value which calculated in runtime]; Because I don't have the field in stack, it's exist in heap so I don't see restrictions to...